As of September 2, 2025: three CEOs in thirteen months.
Mark Schneider (stepped down August 2024).
Laurent Freixe (Sept. 2024 â Sept. 1, 2025, dismissed for code-of-conduct violation).
Philipp Navratil (appointed Sept. 1, 2025).
A CHF 100 billion giant facing persistent instability at the top.
âž»
HUMINT Weak Signals
âą Accelerated turnover: three leaders in thirteen months, diverging visions, chaotic execution. Board perceived as reactive, in sharp contrast with Unilever (one CEO since 2019).
âą Chairmanship under pressure: Paul Bulcke, former CEO turned Chairman without cooling-off, set to step down at the 2026 AGM. Independence questioned, investor frustration rising.
âą Share price pressure: â17% over 12 months (vs. +5% STOXX 600), nearly ââ over five years. Sharper decline than Danone (â10%), signaling NestlĂ©-specific concerns.
âą Defensive strategic agenda: vitamins portfolio under review (5% of sales, below-average margins), persistent frozen food challenges, rumors over its 20% LâOrĂ©al stake. Adjustments perceived as reactive, not visionary.
âž»
The Heart of the Crisis â HUMINT Analysis
This is not just about individuals.
It is governance itself that is on trial.
Rapid rotations, blurred strategic direction.
Nestlé remains profitable (operating margin >17%). But stability masks a broken narrative.
Unlike Disney, which managed difficult transitions, NestlĂ© is opening the door to activist pressure â with players like Third Point waiting for a misstep.
âž»
A Lucid Boardâs Choices â Action-Oriented
1ïžâŁ Stabilize leadership: 24â36 month mandate, public KPIs (organic growth >4%, margin >18%), independent semi-annual review.
2ïžâŁ Strengthen independence: 3-year cooling-off between CEO and Chairman; appoint an external Lead Independent Director.
3ïžâŁ Rebuild investor confidence: clear 2026 guidance, firm portfolio decisions (vitamins by Q4 2025, LâOrĂ©al stake), quarterly roadshows.
4ïžâŁ Execute with discipline: 90/180/360-day plan focused on health/nutrition innovation, tracked via a public dashboard.
âž»
HUMINT Conclusion
Situation: ethical and strategic chaos at the top of Nestlé.
Background: accelerated turnover, contested governance, investor pressure.
Assessment: profitability intact, but systemic risks mounting.
Recommendation: anchor stable leadership, reinforce governance, restore trust with quantified, innovative direction.
This is where HUMINT Advisory makes the difference:
â decoding invisible weak signals,
â mapping the human dynamics behind org charts,
â guiding boards under pressure when every decision counts.
Without this pivot, Nestlé risks remaining hostage to a self-inflicted storm.
âž»
#HUMINTAdvisory #SituationRoom #CEO #Boards #Governance #Leadership #Investors #Strategy #Nestlé


Laisser un commentaire